Indicator | Reasoning | Assessment grade | Confidence | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very poor |
Poor | Fair | Good | Very good |
In state grade | In trend grade | ||
Extent and condition of threatened flora and fauna species | By definition, these species will be in poor (vulnerable species) or very poor (endangered species) condition. The trends are mostly hard to discern from the fragmentary data presented, but the majority of cases suggest a continued decline | Deteriorating | Adequate high-quality evidence and high level of consensus | Evidence and consensus too low to make an assessment | ||||
Extent and condition of threatened ecological communities | By definition, threatened communities are in poor condition. It appears that, for the majority of communities, there have been improvements due to management, although there have been some declines (eg sphagnum bogs and fens) |
Improving | Adequate high-quality evidence and high level of consensus | Limited evidence or limited consensus | ||||
Connectivity of terrestrial native vegetation (ecological community) | The Gungahlin Strategic Assessment led to significant planning of, and monitoring for, connectivity values. Fine-scale modelling of fauna habitat and connectivity across the ACT means that these values are now well understood. However, this knowledge needs to be applied to management and planning decisions to ensure that connectivity values continue to improve. Until the modelling methodology is reapplied, the trend is stable – we are losing connectivity through developments such as the Majura Parkway and the building of new suburbs; however, we are protecting the key links and revegetating some others |
Stable | Limited evidence or limited consensus | Limited evidence or limited consensus | ||||
Protected areas | More than half of the ACT’s entire land area is protected in perpetuity as part of the National Reserve System. The incomplete confidence in the grade reflects:
|
Stable | Adequate high-quality evidence and high level of consensus | Limited evidence or limited consensus | ||||
Rare and insufficiently known species and ecological communities | By definition, we cannot say much about the trend for these species. Those that are rare might be naturally rare or might be in decline. It seems that most on the list are in the latter category; hence, the overall grade is very poor, but some might argue for poor | Unclear | Evidence and consensus too low to make an assessment | Evidence and consensus too low to make an assessment |